Showing posts with label HealthTech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HealthTech. Show all posts

Sunday, September 18, 2011

HealthTech FAIL: lessons for entrepreneurs from startups health gone awry

Train Wreck

Editor's Note: this is a guest post written by Dave Chase, CEO of Avado.com patient relationship management company, which was a finalist in the TechCrunch Disrupt. He was formerly a management consultant to medical practice, Accenture consulting for 25 hospitals and founder of Microsoft health business. You can follow him on Twitter @ chasedave.

Healthtech represents the sector is constantly growing, but from a pool of $ 1 billion that VCs poured into startups in the past year, medical companies only got about 3 per cent of the total. Not so many startups healthtech were able to provide these large enterprises cartridges; However, last week, I drew the attention of one company healthtech seem to be doing it right: Zocdoc, which raised $ 50 million round from summer time earlier this month and suggested some points to consider for startups looking to draw lessons from experiences in Zocdoc (check out the post here.

As the above company numbers from Rip in the post, a lot of startups have not yet really demonstrated the wisdom shown by Zocdoc, resulting in an increasing number of failures healthtech over the past few years. A recent study, inter alia, underlined the phenomenon. After interviewing 110 digital business health RockHealth has recently released the findings of the study, showing the gap between companies that actually receive funding and the many people who have come up empty.

This trip sheds light on why so many companies could not blow healthtech or had to undergo significant changes in order to survive. Below you will find some of the best reasons for startup failure healthtech:

The lack of specific attention or acceptance of terms

Is well known that insufficient attention kills startups in healthcare or not but it is especially common in health care. Healthcare industry suffers from an abundance of pain points and is in serious need of shocks, so it's tempting for new startups to try to resolve them to make the greatest impact. However, these startups ignores the old saying about how to eat an elephant is one bite at a time. Too many startups biting off more than they can chew. It is better to choose one major pain to deal with and go with him.

Expected consumers to pay

With the exception of weight loss programs there are not many examples of consumers pay directly for health services. Over time, this may change, the greater burden of healthcare costs gets switched to consumers, as outlined in part II of a series of health disorders (see references below). Nevertheless, I would be very cautious of any business, expecting that consumers pay in the near-term.

Expected users to enter much information

Although I believe there are more reasons why Google Health is not expecting consumers to enter information is one of the major factors in why personal health records (PHR) failed to gain significant traction. Most of the PHR rely on individual data entry, and few are willing to do so.

Requires an enormous amount of money

This tends to occur during periods of bubble where there is a grand vision and frothy financial markets threw huge amounts of money. Eventually, they were not sustainable franchise.

Require multiple and complex partnership

These runs depends on too many partnerships are likely to run into problems, these partnerships often involve the established players. Unfortunately established players have significantly different sense of urgency. Many good ideas die on the vine, waiting for business development and legal departments on established players who do not share launch a sense of urgency.

There is no understanding of the dynamics of recovery

This is definitely the number one reason why healthtech startups failed. The results of the study RockHealth highlight an important aspect of this. On a positive note 77 per cent of the VCs think health IT investments will increase in the United States by the year 2011. Already 35 digital health care companies with $ 2 m + in year 2011. It is important to note that 80% of them receive funding are B2B (i.e. sale of health professionals in business, etc.), but most entrepreneurs digital health surveyed think consumers will pay for your product or service. Despite this most entrepreneurs digital health early build B2c companies.

Before it's too late, I hope these companies will find a way for anyone except consumers pay. This can be through advertising model or technology licensing for organizations. In this case, the consumer is a product, not the client. The client is an organization.

You can find a complete study of RockHealth in embedded below for your viewing pleasure:

The following is a series of health violations listed above:

Health violations: Pharma 3.0 will encourage the transition from life science investing HealthTech
Health violations: providers will use the HealthTech differentiate and produce better results (part II)
Health violations: providers do newspaper industry mistakes (part III)

Fragment image courtesy of Wikipedia Commons


Avado is a patient relationship management platform that enables health initiative, a partnership between the individual and their health & wellness vendors and gives individual health related records.

Read More

Dave is CEO and co-founder of Avado. Avado is a patient relationship management platform that empowers a health partnership between individuals and their & health wellness providers during ...

Read More

View the original article here

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

HealthTech startups can take lessons from ZocDoc

logo

Editor's Note: this is a guest post was written by David Chase, CEO of Avado.com, a patient relationship management company, which was a finalist in the TechCrunch Disrupt. Previously, he worked as a consultant for medical practice management, Accenture's consulting for 25 hospitals and was the founder of Microsoft in the field of health care business. You can follow him on Twitter @ chasedave.

ZocDoc has just announced a $ 50 m from the daylight saving time. Where many have failed, ZocDoc showed that subversive new model implemented properly can actually work in the field of health. Healthtech run may take a few lessons from ZocDoc experience monitoring by what they have accomplished.

Scrappiness questions. ZocDoc CEO & Co-founder, Cyrus Massoumi was tenacious in getting close to its first customers and doing what it took to close its first customers. He shared that he was waiting in the waiting room of a doctor for 5 hours to talk to a doctor, he wants to. In another case, he was escorted from the building for security due to its retention.

Focuses on the ZocDoc seems to ignore the siren song of the diversion of their principal. This could include getting into price elasticity or electronic medical records. They do one thing extremely well-they fill open slots for doctors and dentists appointment calendars. Now, they have proved that there is a logical place to magnify. For example, think about what happens after registration (insurance law, reminding patients of appointments, etc.). With the authority to which they are created, they can increase revenue per customer if they offer these services.

Great help investors. Although I'm sure that will give their investors most of the credit team ZocDoc, it doesn't hurt to have a better Mark Benioff Vinod and Jeff Bezos followed SV Angel Fund founders and investors.

Development of their sales model. It seems they don't use their website for sale for clinicians. Their Web site is almost entirely focused on the acquisition of the consumer. Their strategy to acquire their client could be regarded as "old school" (that is, from the inside and field sales), but it has been effective. It sounds like they are making significant investments in sales, which is a great way to maximize the value of salesforce.

Word of mouth still works. Doctors and dentists to talk with each other and by giving them a great experience, they get a lot of inbound lead generation. Too often startups peak growth and she bites them back with a negative user experience and negative word of mouth. Without a doubt this helps drive incoming interest.

Start small to go big. As demonstrated by Salesforce.com and others, from small clients is a great way to get initial traction. In the case of ZocDoc, they went in separate doctors instead of continuing to hospitals and clinics. There is no doubt that the opportunity is there if/when they want, but they showed you can build a business with small suppliers first. This may open later than possible with hospitals.

Introduction to geography. This is particularly important in their model, but I think this is an issue for many healthtech startups. Having a critical mass in particular geography makes sense in terms of sales and marketing, helping to shrink the sales cycle and the learning curve. The alternative would be staged in – i.e. emphasis on one specialty before moving to another.

Lead with doctors. As Google health giving presents, leading to a consumer and looking forward to their doctors do not pull in the chances of success. ZocDoc, especially for doctors on Board have a critical mass of available assignments. Although they did consumer marketing, my impression is that doctors now encourage their patients to schedule appointments, thus creating a positive cycle. If the doctor (or any business) will issue the preferred way to interact with them, most consumers will continue to do so. In contrast, most doctors don't listen to the patient or two telling them to take advantage of several new tools.

Call for support of health services. Doctors, for the most part, don't care about technology. I doubt they think about the underlying architecture ZocDoc in solution. Rather, they care about the outcome provided by ZocDoc – fill in the blank appointment slots. For many of their clients, they are the # 1 source for new patients. WhiteGlove health is yet another startup, technology-enabled services with success — their IPO — this week. Technology as the driving force, not as in, more than less profilethis generally.

Congratulations to Cyrus Massoumi and ZocDoc, knocking it out of the Park. This is a good example of the collapse of the health care that is essential. Read more about Cyrus blog.


View the original article here